Netter's Surgical Anatomy Review P.R.N. app for iPhone and iPad
4.0 (
7360 ratings )
Book
Medical
Developer:
Elsevier Inc.
35.99 USD
Current version:
2.2.6, last update: 7 years ago
First release : 10 Nov 2010
App size: 73.13 Mb
Netters Surgical Anatomy Review P.R.N., by Robert B. Trelease, makes it easy to visualize the anatomy that underlies the procedures and clinical conditions you see during a surgical residency or clerkship. Vibrant, detailed artwork by preeminent medical illustrator Frank H. Netter, MD illuminates each structure and its clinical relevance. Compact, concise text enables you to consult the content "as needed." Numerous in-text hyperlinks get you quickly to the information youre looking for. Customers have been asking for a "baby Netter" or "little Netter" anatomy refresher…and here it is!
Latest reviews of Netter's Surgical Anatomy Review P.R.N. app for iPhone and iPad
Desasterous
Zero Stars! I work as consultant since a couple of years and wanted to have my "anatomy lessons learned" from the book right into my mobile. I find only one picture of pelvic and abdominal vessels, this is not really helpful because of the viewing angles.
This work prices half of the atlas, how should a resident understand the clinical impact, if the anatomical pictures are extremely limited?
This App urgently needs an update
Love Netter!
Great for quick review. The Netter clinical art is awesome!
Overpriced
This was suppose to be a great resource and it is to some extent, but to not cover anything about the heart and lungs in a surgical anatomy text is really a rip off!!! Even more disappointing is the fact that the book has the name "Netter" on it. Also no in book search tool! The book has potential but given the lack of depth and the price, I will give it 2 star. I need a refund..
Dr
Good review to have on hand. Drawings are classic Netter and easy to read.
Dilute Netters with little added functionality/info
It is better and cheaper to just load a PDF of Netters onto your phone, which seems to be what the creators did anyway, the only difference being the addition of severely lacking lists of terminology.
Also, poor functionality.
Write review